Ultrafine Particles and Fumes From 3D Printers: How Dangerous are They?
What You May Have Heard
Anyone that’s been active in the 3D printing community for very long has heard the stories. Children having trouble breathing or an asthma attack occurring after prolonged exposure to “toxic fumes” from a 3D printer. There are always alarmists surrounding new technology and 3D printers are not exempt. But how much of it is true? Two studies have been done regarding ultrafine particles (UFPs) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emissions from 3D printers. Students and staff from the Illinois Institute of Technology and The University of Texas conducted both studies. We’ll discuss their studies as well as the implications of what they discovered.
Four different 3D printers were used in testing: a FlashForge Creator, a Dremel 3D Idea Builder, an XYZprinting da Vinci 1.0, a Lulzbot Mini, and a Makerbot Replicator 2X. Each printer had different filaments tested on it according to their individual capabilities. The filaments tested included ABS, PLA, HIPS, nylon, polycarbonate, PCTPE, T-Glase, and a wood-fill filament. For each test an object was printed inside a chamber with a particle analyzer at the mouth of an exhaust port. Researchers used a 10x10x1 cm sample from the National Institute of Standards and Technology, pictured below.
Ultrafine Particles When 3D Printing
Ultrafine particles are any particle under 100 nano meters in diameter. As of yet there are no standards of law regarding this size of air pollutant. That means that unlike cars or lumber there is no regulation on emissions. There is no testing required of 3D printer manufacturers to make sure their printers create a safe amount of UFPs. There is another problem though. Scientists do not yet know what safe amount of UFPs are. Studies are happening right now to determine what is and isn’t safe. Until then we as consumers will have to be vigilant and ensure that our printers are safe to use ourselves.
The data from the study shows that ABS produces around 3 orders of magnitude more UFPs than PLA. Let’s put these numbers into perspective. Cooking with high heat on a gas stove with no ventilation produces about 106 particles/cm3. PLA emits about 108 particles/cm3. ABS nearly doubles cooking in magnitude with about 1011 particles/cm3. The difference between cooking and 3D printing is that one doesn’t cook for 10 hours at a time over and over. The amount of UFPs given off over a week of 3D printing will be much greater than those given off over a week of cooking.
Now let’s examine the health risks of UFPs. Ultrafine particles are dangerous because they can be absorbed through the pulmonary alveolus and epidermis. They are most commonly known to cause respiratory related illnesses such as tracheitis, bronchitis, and asthma. More serious ailments such as cancer can sometimes develop as well. The severity of the potential problems caused by UFPs makes the study even more important.
Volatile Organic Compounds
The EPA defines VOCs as any gases given off by certain materials that can have an adverse affect on health. Paint, aerosol sprays, gasoline, cooking, photocopying, and much more all emit VOCs. There are thousands of household items that produce VOCs. Not all VOCs are harmful though. Many are completely safe. The specific chemical makeup of the compound as well as the level of exposure to it determines its toxicity. For example, ABS is far more toxic than PLA because ABS fumes consist mostly of styrene. Styrene vapor has a sharp, unpleasant smell which is what some people smell when printing ABS. All tests of ABS resulted in high concentrations of styrene. PLA on the other hand produces very low levels of mostly lactide. Scientists consider lactide non-toxic and relatively harmless.
Unlike UFPs, VOCs have been studied extensively. Scientists have a much better understanding of what they can do to a persons health. Effects may include nose and throat irritation, headaches, and kidney and liver damage. Cancer is also caused in animals but it is unclear whether human have the same reaction. The study shows that the three main chemicals in 3D printing VOCs are Lactide, Styrene, and Propylene Glycol. Of those three, researchers agree that only styrene is toxic. This shows that ABS is among the worst filaments to print regarding VOCs.
What’s the Solution?
We now know that 3D printers do in fact produce both UFPs and VOCs. ABS is by far the worst in both categories. PLA had low numbers all around and HIPS, nylon, polycarbonate, PCTPE, T-Glase, and the wood-fill filament all fell in the middle. The emissions from 3D printers are harmful. You could become very sick under the right conditions. If you’re only printing PLA once a week then good ventilation would probably be adequate to protect yourself. For more toxic filaments or more active printers, an enclosure with a Hepa or carbon activated filter is a good idea. Many stores sell basic filters for under $20; a worthwhile investment into your own health.
This is really good 2 know. I have an air purifier and am very concerned about the air my family and I breathe. I would make sure that my air purifier can handle the VOC’s and such. Great article.
Good info to keep an eye on , Thanks
That’s good to know. I have been hearing mixed thoughts for a while now. Nice to get some good facts
This is very good information. I have been printing right in my dining room. Time to build an enclosure!
I’ve been thinking about putting my 3D printer in my room but I am seriously re-thinking it now! How many of you have your 3D printer in your house? I guess I should ask that question in the forum. I have an idea of making an enclosed case out of plexiglass with a filter. I hate going out into the garage because it’s so cold in the Fall/Winter and so hot in the Summer! I have an extra bedroom I think I’ll put it in after I’ve run it for a month or two. I want to make sure I didn’t make a mistake putting the printer together that could cause a fire while I’m not watching it. I have a very healthy fear or fire! But that’s a whole-other thing! haha. I am now thinking about making an exhaust that pumps all the UFPs and VOCs out the window!! I might be over thinking it after reading this and getting over paranoid! But it wouldn’t hurt to take extra steps to keep all the bad stuff from getting into my lungs. My grandfather passed from lung cancer and my father passed from leukemia…Sooo, the more careful I am the better.
I work for 3DPrintClean and we’ve manufacutered a safety enclosure which includes filtration. Please feel free to view our solution at http://www.3dprintclean.com and feel free to ask any questions you may have.
We have deployed many units into educational, corporate and government verticals. Our solution includes safety features such as, locking doors, poly carbonate windows, thermal cut off, & fire suppression.
Sounds great! 🙂
It certainly looks great, but it is also very pricy for most 3d printer users, isn’t it?
The guys from http://box3d.eu are a lot cheaper.
Even more with their new version which is now at kickstarter for EUR 199 / USD 249 this month
Great article and very good information.
Very good to know thanks
I know this is an old article, but there is a very important error, that really alters the meaning.
The article states:
“Cooking with high heat on a gas stove with no ventilation produces about 10^6 particles/cm3. PLA emits about 10^8 particles/cm3. ABS nearly doubles cooking in magnitude with about 10^11 particles/cm3.”
10^11 is not “nearly double” of 10^6. It’s 10.000 times more. So PLA printing emits 100 times more particles than cooking and ABS 10.000 times more.